| Information | ![]() | |
Derechos | Equipo Nizkor
| ||
04Jan26
Trump's gunboat diplomacy
It wasn't a surprise, exactly.
Trump had been telegraphing for months that he was planning to take action against Venezuela. The administration called President Nicolás Maduro a narco-terrorist and carried out dozens of lethal strikes on small boats near the Venezuelan coast. More recently, it began seizing tankers carrying Venezuelan oil.
But the form that action took -- special forces seizing Maduro and his wife from a military compound in a nighttime operation, and taking them to New York, where Maduro now sits in a Brooklyn jail -- was still brazen enough to be shocking.
The U.S. is keeping a military presence in the Caribbean to impose its policy agenda on Venezuela, while the Maduros face narco-terrorism and drug trafficking charges. Trump even acknowledged the potential for entanglement: "We're not afraid of boots on the ground." And he was remarkably open about his intention to have U.S. companies tap into Venezuela's lucrative oil reserves.
If you think all this has echoes of the Iraq War that overthrew Saddam Hussein, you're not alone. One big difference is that this is the Western Hemisphere, which Trump officials have claimed as America's rightful sphere of influence.
My colleague Anatoly Kurmanaev is on the ground in Venezuela. He told me that the operation in the early hours on Saturday was also a show of strength to other countries in the region. "The message is: The U.S. can and will enforce its will."
Was it legal? How long will the U.S. remain involved in Venezuela? How exactly did troops manage to capture Maduro? How are Venezuelans and other countries thinking about Maduro's seizure? We have some answers below. To follow the latest news, here are our live updates.
Operation Absolute Resolve
The plan to capture Maduro was four months in the making. C.I.A. operatives slipped into the country in August. With the help of stealth drones and an informant in Maduro's government, they studied his every movement. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said the U.S. knew where Maduro slept, what he ate and even what pets he kept.
In Kentucky, the military built a full-scale model of a compound Maduro stayed in -- among the six to eight locations he used to hide. Elite Army Delta Force commandos then rehearsed the strike, blowing through steel doors at an ever-faster pace. When the weather was clear, and Maduro opted to stay at the compound that they had trained to attack, the commandos struck.
After a cyberattack cut power to large parts of Caracas, 150 American planes, drones and helicopters could approach undetected. They bombed radar and air-defense sites and dropped off the commandos at Venezuela's most fortified military base. The Delta Force commandos blew open a door and found Maduro three minutes later.
It took little more than two hours; Trump followed along remotely. "I watched it, literally, like I was watching a television show," he told Fox News. Afterward, he posted an image appearing to show Maduro blindfolded and handcuffed.
What's next for Venezuela?
After walking back Trump's assertion that the U.S. would "run" Venezuela, administration officials made clear that what the president had meant was not literally running the country -- only its "policy." But who will be in charge and how will it work?
It's not an occupation. Pentagon officials said yesterday that there were no U.S. military personnel in the country. (Though U.S. troops will remain in the Caribbean Sea to exert "leverage" on the new leadership, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said.)
It's also not regime change. Venezuela's opposition leader, María Corina Machado, who won the Nobel Peace Prize last year and dedicated it to Trump, has been sidelined: Trump said Machado lacked the "respect" needed to govern.
Instead, the U.S. has accepted having Maduro's vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, as interim leader. Trump said she would hold power as long as she "does what we want."
As my colleagues write, the administration has "vaguely sketched out an arrangement similar to a guardianship: The U.S. will provide a vision for how Venezuela should be run and will expect the interim government to carry that out in a transition period, under the threat of further military intervention."
Will Rodríguez cooperate? In the aftermath of Maduro's seizure, she called the U.S. an illegal invader and said Maduro was the "only president." But as Anatoly told me, "for all the public statements, she will work with Trump."
That also seems to be what she told U.S. officials: Trump said at the news conference that she was "essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again."
Drugs, democracy -- or oil?
U.S. officials have put forward several different explanations for the military buildup around Venezuela in recent months. Some have cited drugs; others Maduro's illegitimate election. But this weekend, Trump said that a key goal of the operation was to regain U.S. oil rights that he said Venezuela had "stolen" when it nationalized the industry.
Trump said U.S. oil companies would "go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money" -- both for Venezuelans and for themselves.
My colleague David Sanger has described this as a"naked grab" for oil. Watch him explain the implications of Trump's move on Venezuela in the video above.
Is all this legal? It certainly seems to violate the U.N. Charter. That states a nation may not use force on the sovereign territory of another country without its consent, a self-defense rationale or the authorization of the U.N. Security Council, as my colleague Charlie Savage writes.
The Trump administration says this was a law-enforcement action, rather than a military invasion. Maduro has been indicted in the U.S. on drug and corruption charges and is expected to appear in court today.
A wide spectrum of reactions
Left-leaning governments in Latin America, like Brazil and Mexico, denounced the operation as illegal. So did China (which has been importing oil from Venezuela) and Russia (its own illegal invasion of Ukraine notwithstanding).
The U.N. secretary general said the attack set a "dangerous precedent." The Security Council plans to meet today.
European leaders were more cautious. Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany said that Maduro had "led his country into ruin" and that the U.S. intervention required "careful consideration." President Emmanuel Macron of France said the Venezuelan people could "only rejoice" at the ousting of Maduro.
Venezuela's state-run TV broadcast protests and rallies staged by Maduro's supporters over the weekend. But my colleagues on the ground reported that many Venezuelans told them they wanted change. A majority had voted against Maduro in the last two presidential elections.
[Source: By Katrin Bennhold, The New York Times, NY, 04Jan26]
![]() | This document has been published on 17Jan26 by the Equipo Nizkor and Derechos Human Rights. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. |